Benefits of Free Healthcare to a Country

 

Just like shelter and food, a person would contribute to economic development in a country if he or she is in good health. Every citizen in a country should have access to a comprehensive and quality healthcare irrespective of race, gender, and ethnic. Free or affordable health care would enable individuals to maintain health, restore health after illness or injury, and prevent diseases without spending much. There are some chronic conditions like cancer or diabetes which would require a high cost for treatment or control and if the patient is left without any support it would probably lead to death. The government should help such patient to continue enjoying life just like other who are economically advantaged. It is the role of the government ensure that access to affordable or free healthcare is not a privilege, but a right to all its citizens.

Free or subsidized healthcare would lengthen the lifespan of citizens in a country. Reducing the costs incurred to get treatment would enable people to visit hospitals frequently for check-ups and treatments. In return, people would have minimal cases of being attacked by diseases that would lead to death (Shi & Douglas 1). They would have higher chances of living longer than persons who does not visit healthcare centers regularly. A country like Canada with good healthcare system have their citizens living longer as opposed to developing countries where people have to pay for their medical care. Longer lifespan would enable a country to continue enjoying a labor force with experience in the various field that would yield the best result during production. The country would enjoy the benefits of specialization since these people remain in their respective departments for a longer time and gain experience.

A country where the government caters for costs of healthcare would experience high economic development. Money that would have been directed to treatment by an individual can now be invested in other economic activities if the government pays hospital bills. Other than the citizens investing, the country will receive external investors since they are attracted to free treatment in the country. Professionals would also have reasons to move to such countries. Therefore, the needs to provide free medical care to retain and attract experts who are the engines of economic growth.

Free healthcare would improve public health in a country. Old people with low income would be able to get medical services if the government provides it for free. There is another group of insecure people without health insurance programs who would die if attacked by diseases since they cannot afford high costs of healthcare. Illness does not consider whether a person has resources or not. It can come at any time and any age. People need to be prepared for it, but some conditions would not allow some people to access quality healthcare. With free healthcare, these poor people would get treatment to some chronic conditions like heart disease and diabetes that seems to be expensive (Shi & Douglas 2).

Finally, free healthcare could benefit private businesses. The businesses do not have to pay for employee health insurance policies since it is catered for by the government (Collins et al. 1). The money that would have been set aside by the companies to pay for the insurance policies can now be used to expand the business to create more jobs for people. It would also promote the spirit of entrepreneurship in the country since the investors do not have to spend more in paying health insurance covers.

Barriers to Care: The Challenges for Canadian Refugees and Their Health Care Providers

The article highlights the growing number of immigrants in Canada and the health disparities they face. Despite the country having in place a comprehensive healthcare system, there seems to be an eminent lack of attention to the needs of immigrants who continually suffer because of the same. They face a variety of issues, one of which is the inaccessibility to healthcare services. In this case, a majority of the immigrant populace does not have health insurance cover, and many do not even know where to go for them to access quality care (McKeary and Newbold 524).  The authors conducted a study that involved interviews with a group of Canadian immigrants who provided feedback on the inability to access quality care. Many reside in rural areas that do not have trained professionals who can offer quality services, and are not knowledgeable of where to go for better services (McKeary and Newbold 528). Additionally, the article addresses cultural incompetence as one of the common issues affecting this population. Here, it became apparent that the healthcare system lacks professionals who are well-equipped to mitigate issues that emanate from treating a culturally different group. More so, many immigrants do not comprehend the healthcare system in the country, something that highly inhibits their ability to access care.

The access to care begins with ensuring that healthcare practitioners meet the standardized needs of a culturally diverse demographic. Commendably, the article clearly brings out the aspects of the training or professionals who understand such care. However, this alone will not be very helpful. There is a need to bring healthcare to the people in a very literal manner. The healthcare industry should strive to train and employ more professionals who will then be stationed in places that have higher populations of immigrants. The article mentions the accessibility of care as one of the pertinent issues that affect immigrants and proposes training. However, this alone will not help since immigrants need to physically access care and also be informed about its beneficial aspects. More so, the healthcare system should incorporate provisions that will accommodate this population that lives without coverage. This approach would present an efficient way to solve the issues currently facing the refugees.